Adsorption Capacity Comparision between Silica Gel and Activated Clay Desiccant
Adsorption Capacity Chart of Activated Clay Desiccant HX-SORBP
Oxide Content of Activated Clay Desiccant
|
Content |
SiO2 |
Al2O3 |
Fe2O3 |
Na2O |
K2O |
CaO |
MgO |
MnO |
TiO2 |
|
% |
55.6-60.5 |
9.0-10.1 |
5.7-6.7 |
0.03-0.11 |
0.96-1.30 |
0.42-1.95 |
10.7-11.35 |
0.61 |
0.32-0.63 |
Advantage of Clay Desiccant against Silica Gel
b. Environment Friendly
c. Better to repack
d. Free DMF
e. Free SVHC
Calculation Method of Desiccant’s Dosage
According to MIL-D-3464, desiccant is used in units, a UNIT is approximate one ounce (28 grams). In relative humidity of 25%&temperature of 25°C, a UNIT can adsorb 3 grams’ moisture at least. In relative humidity of 40%&temperature of 25°C, a UNIT can absorb 6 grams’ moisture at least. (1 Cubic Meter= 35.3146667 Cubic Inch)
|
Flat &Flexible Packing Bag |
Stiff Container |
|||||
|
Square Foot |
Square Inch |
Square Meter |
Gallon |
Cubic Foot |
Cubic Inch |
Desiccant（UNIT） |
|
0.1 |
15 |
0.01 |
1.1 |
0.14 |
237 |
1/6 |
|
0.2 |
30 |
0.02 |
2.1 |
0.28 |
476 |
1/3 |
|
0.3 |
45 |
0.03 |
3.2 |
0.42 |
714 |
1/2 |
|
0.6 |
90 |
0.06 |
6.2 |
0.83 |
1428 |
1 |
|
1.3 |
180 |
0.12 |
12.5 |
1.67 |
2856 |
2 |
|
1.9 |
270 |
0.17 |
18.7 |
2.5 |
4284 |
3 |
|
2.5 |
360 |
0.23 |
25 |
3.33 |
5715 |
4 |
|
3.1 |
450 |
0.3 |
31.2 |
4.16 |
7140 |
5 |
|
3.8 |
540 |
0.35 |
37.4 |
5 |
8568 |
6 |
|
4.4 |
630 |
0.41 |
43.6 |
5.83 |
9996 |
7 |
|
5 |
720 |
0.46 |
50 |
6.66 |
11424 |
8 |
|
5.6 |
810 |
0.52 |
56.1 |
7.5 |
12852 |
9 |
|
6.3 |
900 |
0.58 |
62.3 |
8.33 |
14280 |
10 |
|
7.5 |
1080 |
0.7 |
74.8 |
10 |
17136 |
12 |
|
8.8 |
1260 |
0.81 |
87.3 |
11.66 |
19992 |
14 |
|
10 |
1440 |
0.93 |
99.7 |
13.32 |
22850 |
16 |
|
20 |
2880 |
1.86 |
199.4 |
26.64 |
45700 |
32 |
|
50 |
7200 |
4.64 |
498.5 |
66.65 |
114250 |
80 |
|
100 |
14400 |
9.29 |
997 |
133.3 |
228500 |
160 |
|
120 |
18000 |
11.61 |
1240 |
166 |
285600 |
200 |
|
150 |
22500 |
14.51 |
1550 |
207 |
357000 |
250 |
